I integrated my thoughts and wrote down my preliminary ideas.
Through reading the document, here’s my idea.
I think the core concept in the article is "The answer may have to do with the way we process information." and “the assault has changed our brains and our view of reality and truth.”
At first glance, it is obvious that people from the two eras are painted in the same painting, and the background changes behind indicate whether the people in the painting are in the age of war or peace. But when we found a smile on the face of the modern man on the right, because of this smile, I began to wonder if the painting was ironic? I also feel that the painting is a bit funny and absurd. Looking closely at the middle, we will see two villains, which makes me wonder if this painting will be a story like Aesop's fables.
I think in this painting, the smile and the villain are both Assault. Assault is the connection with ambiguity and truth, using the form of “assault” is to construct a new narrative and tell the truth.
The second painting is also, because of smile, we feel ambiguous, but I think if we think it is beautiful, we can believe what we want to express in the picture.
German graphic design studio Vierkant designed for "Breaking the Law". This book deals with crime themes. The designer locked the book in a fence with a silver chain. Readers must destroy the fence and paper before reading the content, and delve into the atmosphere of the book with a sense of ritual.
Cuz I really love to do models with materials. I think I can use what I am good at to express the pictures I want to express with materials. I think this adds to the interest of this book. I can use an attached page or a small leaflet for the text. I hope that people who use this book can read it in their own way—you can read it or not, and believe what they want and believe.
I think the font can be distorted. As we can see, the upper part of the word is real, and the lower part is deformed through distortion, we will be ambiguous and may not know the true truth, I think that is ambiguity. The audience can trust whatever they see.
Comments